Donald Trump is off the hook. Someone else has stepped up and is purchasing Ed McMahon's house.
Ed has been dogged by his L.A. mansion, which was sitting on the brink of foreclosure. Last week, Donald said he would help the man he admired by buying the property. Ed's realtor, Alex Davis, tells us Trump actually made a written offer but was outbid.
Ed's rep says the buyer surfaced last week, after Trump got all that publicity. We're told escrow opened yesterday but it's still not a done deal.
As for who's buying the house, the out-of-state buyer wants confidentiality. However, Ed's rep says it's not John McCain.
And we just got this statement from The Donald: "...The other buyer has signed a purchase agreement....subject to many contingencies including but not limited to a mortgage contingency. Mr. Trump clearly would not need a mortgage and would be capable of closing this transaction immediately. If the other buyer should be successful in this bid, Mr. Trump truly hopes that they do the right thing by Ed McMahon and not have this 85-year-old American icon removed from the property."
So here's the question -- If Donald really wants Ed to stay in the house, why didn't he just outbid the buyer?
More info
Saturday, 23 August 2008
Wednesday, 13 August 2008
Study Links Buzz From First Smoke, And Regular Smoking, With Gene
�Anyone wHO has ever tried smoke probably remembers that kickoff cigarette vividly. For some, it brought a wave of nausea or a nasty cough fit. For others, those first puffs also came with a rush of pleasure or "buzz."
Now, a new study links those first experiences with smoking, and the likelihood that a someone is presently a tobacco user, to a particular transmissible variation. The finding may help excuse the way of life that leads from that first fag to lifelong smoking.
The new finding as well adds to growing suspicion surrounding the role of a particular nicotine-receptor cistron in smoking-related behaviors and in lung cancer. Other researchers let already coupled variations in the same genetic region to smokers' level of dependence on nicotine, to the issue of cigarettes smoked per day and to a far higher risk of lung crab the ultimate outcome of a life-time of smoking.
In a paper published on-line in the journal Addiction, a multi-university collaborative team of researchers specializing in statistical genetics, gene analysis, and trait analysis reports an association between a variant in the CHRNA5 nicotine receptor gene, initial smoking experiences, and electric current smoking patterns.
The genetic and smoking data come from 435 volunteers. Those wHO never smoke-cured had tried at least one fag but no more than 100 cigarettes in their lives, and never formed a smoke habit. The regular smokers had smoke-cured at least five cigarettes a day for at least the past five years.
The regular smokers in the report were far more likely than the never-smokers to have the less common rs16969968 form of the CHRNA5 cistron, in which just unitary base-pair in the cistron sequence was different from the more common form. This tolerant of genetic variation is called a single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP.
Smokers were also eight times as likely to report that their first cigarettes gave them a pleasurable buzz.
"It appears that for masses who experience a certain genetic make-up, the initial physical reaction to smoke can play a significant role in determining what happens adjacent," says older author and project leader, Ovide Pomerleau, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Michigan Medical School and founder of the U-M Nicotine Research Laboratory.
"If cigaret smoking is sustained, nicotine addiction tooshie occur in a few days to a few months," he adds. "The finding of a genetic association with pleasurable early smoking experiences may help explain how people get addicted and, of course, once addicted, many will keep smoking for the rest of their lives."
The researchers point out that the genetic variant explains only a portion of human smoke behavior, and that a more complete explanation of why people smoke and why they can't throw in the towel will require much more information virtually how genes interact with social influences and other environmental factors.
Pomerleau predicts that the ability to radio link behavioral patterns in smoking to private genotypes testament need extensive information concerning behavior, genes, and the environmental setting as well as bioinformatic tools to bring it all together. "Understanding the genetics of complex disorders such as nicotine addiction will command much more than research on key traits," he says.
The team notes that the CHRNA5 relationships appear to be strong and that practical applications from this research let in new genetical tests for smoking peril and the development of medications that target smoking-risk genes.
Pomerleau states that the new report builds on findings reported last year by buster author Laura Bierut, in which a whole-genome survey found that the like single base polymorphism, rs16969968, of the CHRNA5 gene was associated with smokers' level of nicotine dependence.
He also notes that, this year, trey papers promulgated independently of one another demonstrated that variations in the same gene, and related genes, greatly increase the risk of exposure of lung cancer.
Taking into account its links to increased liking of initial smoking, stronger likelihood of getting addicted to nicotine, and greater probability of developing lung cancer, this genetic chance variable may well constitute a "triple whammy" for smoking-related disease, he says.
A mechanism for explaining increased disease risk, proposed by one of the cancer genetic science researchers, is the possibility that sure chemicals, for instance N-nitrosonornicotine in tobacco smoke, act on nicotine receptors in the lung to bring forth cancer-causing changes a work on known as tumorigenesis.
The modern findings linking first smoking experiences, smoking habits, and genetic variation build on previous research by Ovide Pomerleau and Cynthia Pomerleau, Ph.D., at U-M. In studies conducted over a 10-year span, they documented a connectedness between nicotine-dependent smoking and positive number one smoking experiences.
Ovide Pomerleau too credits before animal inquiry by his colleagues Allan Collins and Jerry Stitzel at the University of Colorado, for providing the impetus for the thought that initial reactivity to nicotine might set the stage for the development of nicotine dependence and that nicotine receptor genetical variations underlie this treat. Stitzel at one time worked at U-M.
The authors of the new paper are Richard Sherva, John P. Rice, Laura J. Bierut and Rosalind J. Neuman of the Department of Psychiatry at the Washington University School of Medicine; Kirk Wilhelmsen of the Department of Genetics and Neurology at the Carolina Center for Genome Sciences; Ovide Pomerleau, Cynthia S. Pomerleau and Sandy M. Snedecor of the U-M Department of Psychiatry; and Scott A. Chasse of the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics at the University of North Carolina. Reference: Addiction, doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02279.x).
Ovide Pomerleau and Laura Bierut serve on advisory boards for nicotine treatment pharmaceuticals for Pfizer, Inc. Laura Bierut and John Rice at Washington University hold a patent on the CHRNA5 SNP that has been licenced by Perlegen Sciences.
For more than information on nicotine enquiry at the University of Michigan, chaffer http://www.psych.master of Education.umich.edu/niclab/
University of Michigan Health System
2901 Hubbard St., Ste. 2400
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2435
United States
http://www.med.umich.edu
More info
Now, a new study links those first experiences with smoking, and the likelihood that a someone is presently a tobacco user, to a particular transmissible variation. The finding may help excuse the way of life that leads from that first fag to lifelong smoking.
The new finding as well adds to growing suspicion surrounding the role of a particular nicotine-receptor cistron in smoking-related behaviors and in lung cancer. Other researchers let already coupled variations in the same genetic region to smokers' level of dependence on nicotine, to the issue of cigarettes smoked per day and to a far higher risk of lung crab the ultimate outcome of a life-time of smoking.
In a paper published on-line in the journal Addiction, a multi-university collaborative team of researchers specializing in statistical genetics, gene analysis, and trait analysis reports an association between a variant in the CHRNA5 nicotine receptor gene, initial smoking experiences, and electric current smoking patterns.
The genetic and smoking data come from 435 volunteers. Those wHO never smoke-cured had tried at least one fag but no more than 100 cigarettes in their lives, and never formed a smoke habit. The regular smokers had smoke-cured at least five cigarettes a day for at least the past five years.
The regular smokers in the report were far more likely than the never-smokers to have the less common rs16969968 form of the CHRNA5 cistron, in which just unitary base-pair in the cistron sequence was different from the more common form. This tolerant of genetic variation is called a single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP.
Smokers were also eight times as likely to report that their first cigarettes gave them a pleasurable buzz.
"It appears that for masses who experience a certain genetic make-up, the initial physical reaction to smoke can play a significant role in determining what happens adjacent," says older author and project leader, Ovide Pomerleau, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Michigan Medical School and founder of the U-M Nicotine Research Laboratory.
"If cigaret smoking is sustained, nicotine addiction tooshie occur in a few days to a few months," he adds. "The finding of a genetic association with pleasurable early smoking experiences may help explain how people get addicted and, of course, once addicted, many will keep smoking for the rest of their lives."
The researchers point out that the genetic variant explains only a portion of human smoke behavior, and that a more complete explanation of why people smoke and why they can't throw in the towel will require much more information virtually how genes interact with social influences and other environmental factors.
Pomerleau predicts that the ability to radio link behavioral patterns in smoking to private genotypes testament need extensive information concerning behavior, genes, and the environmental setting as well as bioinformatic tools to bring it all together. "Understanding the genetics of complex disorders such as nicotine addiction will command much more than research on key traits," he says.
The team notes that the CHRNA5 relationships appear to be strong and that practical applications from this research let in new genetical tests for smoking peril and the development of medications that target smoking-risk genes.
Pomerleau states that the new report builds on findings reported last year by buster author Laura Bierut, in which a whole-genome survey found that the like single base polymorphism, rs16969968, of the CHRNA5 gene was associated with smokers' level of nicotine dependence.
He also notes that, this year, trey papers promulgated independently of one another demonstrated that variations in the same gene, and related genes, greatly increase the risk of exposure of lung cancer.
Taking into account its links to increased liking of initial smoking, stronger likelihood of getting addicted to nicotine, and greater probability of developing lung cancer, this genetic chance variable may well constitute a "triple whammy" for smoking-related disease, he says.
A mechanism for explaining increased disease risk, proposed by one of the cancer genetic science researchers, is the possibility that sure chemicals, for instance N-nitrosonornicotine in tobacco smoke, act on nicotine receptors in the lung to bring forth cancer-causing changes a work on known as tumorigenesis.
The modern findings linking first smoking experiences, smoking habits, and genetic variation build on previous research by Ovide Pomerleau and Cynthia Pomerleau, Ph.D., at U-M. In studies conducted over a 10-year span, they documented a connectedness between nicotine-dependent smoking and positive number one smoking experiences.
Ovide Pomerleau too credits before animal inquiry by his colleagues Allan Collins and Jerry Stitzel at the University of Colorado, for providing the impetus for the thought that initial reactivity to nicotine might set the stage for the development of nicotine dependence and that nicotine receptor genetical variations underlie this treat. Stitzel at one time worked at U-M.
The authors of the new paper are Richard Sherva, John P. Rice, Laura J. Bierut and Rosalind J. Neuman of the Department of Psychiatry at the Washington University School of Medicine; Kirk Wilhelmsen of the Department of Genetics and Neurology at the Carolina Center for Genome Sciences; Ovide Pomerleau, Cynthia S. Pomerleau and Sandy M. Snedecor of the U-M Department of Psychiatry; and Scott A. Chasse of the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics at the University of North Carolina. Reference: Addiction, doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02279.x).
Ovide Pomerleau and Laura Bierut serve on advisory boards for nicotine treatment pharmaceuticals for Pfizer, Inc. Laura Bierut and John Rice at Washington University hold a patent on the CHRNA5 SNP that has been licenced by Perlegen Sciences.
For more than information on nicotine enquiry at the University of Michigan, chaffer http://www.psych.master of Education.umich.edu/niclab/
University of Michigan Health System
2901 Hubbard St., Ste. 2400
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2435
United States
http://www.med.umich.edu
More info
Wednesday, 6 August 2008
Live
Artist: Live
Genre(s):
Rock: Pop-Rock
ROck: Alternative
Discography:
Distance To Here
Year: 2005
Tracks: 13
Awake: The Best Of
Year: 2004
Tracks: 19
Heaven
Year: 2003
Tracks: 4
Birds Of Pray
Year: 2003
Tracks: 13
V
Year: 2001
Tracks: 15
Overcome
Year: 2001
Tracks: 3
Secret Samadhi
Year: 1997
Tracks: 12
Throwing Copper (Limited Edition)
Year: 1994
Tracks: 14
Mental Jewelry
Year: 1991
Tracks: 12
Live rose to chart success on the military strength of its anthemic music and elevated, overtly spectral songwriting, two hallmarks which earned the group sponsor comparisons to U2. Live first
Audiosex
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)